DVS Edition Citation

Lanza, M. B., Martins-Costa, H. C., De Souza, C. C., Lima, F. V., Diniz, R. C.R. & Chagas, M. H. (2022). Muscle volume vs. anatomical cross-sectional area: Different muscle assessment does not affect the muscle size-strength relationship. Journal of Biomechanics, 132 , 110956. Zugriff am 07.02.2023 unter https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.110956

APA (7th ed.) Citation

Lanza, M. B., Martins-Costa, H. C., De Souza, C. C., Lima, F. V., Diniz, R. C., & Chagas, M. H. (2022). Muscle volume vs. anatomical cross-sectional area: Different muscle assessment does not affect the muscle size-strength relationship. Journal of Biomechanics, 132, 110956.

Chicago Style (17th ed.) Citation

Lanza, M. B., H. C. Martins-Costa, C. C. De Souza, F. V. Lima, R. C.R Diniz, and M. H. Chagas. "Muscle Volume Vs. Anatomical Cross-sectional Area: Different Muscle Assessment Does Not Affect the Muscle Size-strength Relationship." Journal of Biomechanics 132 (2022): 110956.

MLA (9th ed.) Citation

Lanza, M. B., et al. "Muscle Volume Vs. Anatomical Cross-sectional Area: Different Muscle Assessment Does Not Affect the Muscle Size-strength Relationship." Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 132, 2022, p. 110956.