Dean, E, Osborne, A, Subar, D, Hendrickse, P & Gaffney, C. J. (2026). Comparative effects of a glucose-fructose bar, glucose-fructose hydrogel and maltodextrin gel on carbohydrate oxidation and sprint performance in Tier 2 athletes. Experimental Physiology, 111 (4), 1831-1846. Zugriff am 04.05.2026 unter https://doi.org/10.1113/EP093136
APA-Zitierstil (7. Ausg.)Dean, E., Osborne, A., Subar, D., Hendrickse, P., & Gaffney, C. J. (2026). Comparative effects of a glucose-fructose bar, glucose-fructose hydrogel and maltodextrin gel on carbohydrate oxidation and sprint performance in Tier 2 athletes. Experimental Physiology, 111(4), 1831-1846.
Chicago-Zitierstil (17. Ausg.)Dean, E., A. Osborne, D. Subar, P. Hendrickse, und C. J. Gaffney. "Comparative Effects of a Glucose-fructose Bar, Glucose-fructose Hydrogel and Maltodextrin Gel on Carbohydrate Oxidation and Sprint Performance in Tier 2 Athletes." Experimental Physiology 111, no. 4 (2026): 1831-1846.
MLA-Zitierstil (9. Ausg.)Dean, E., et al. "Comparative Effects of a Glucose-fructose Bar, Glucose-fructose Hydrogel and Maltodextrin Gel on Carbohydrate Oxidation and Sprint Performance in Tier 2 Athletes." Experimental Physiology, vol. 111, no. 4, 2026, pp. 1831-1846.