Comparing human-led reflective dialogue and AI-based tactical guidance as innovative training approaches in soccer: effects on tactical performance and problem-solving

(Ein Vergleich zwischen von Menschen geleitetem reflektierendem Dialog und KI-basierter taktischer Anleitung als innovative Trainingsansätze im Fußball: Auswirkungen auf die taktische Leistung und die Problemlösungsfähigkeit)

Background The integration of human-led reflective dialogue and artificial intelligence represents two emerging, contrasting approaches to tactical training in soccer. However, the comparative effectiveness of these approaches within applied training environments remains insufficiently examined. Aim This study evaluated the differential effects of structured human idea-debate sessions versus AI-generated tactical guidance on tactical performance and problem-solving competencies during soccer training. Methods Eighty-four male amateur soccer players (age 17.1 ± 0.7 years) were randomly allocated to three groups (n = 28 each): Human Idea-Debate (HID), employing a play-discuss-play training model in which players collectively analyzed tactical problems and formulated solutions; AI-Ideation Delivery (AIID), implementing ChatGPT-generated tactical action plans as an AI-based training intervention; and a passive Control Group (CG). The intervention comprised eight small-sided game sessions (7v7 format, 50 × 40 m pitch), delivered twice per week over four weeks. Tactical performance was assessed using the Team Sport Assessment Procedure, while problem-solving competencies were evaluated using the validated Arabic Problem-Solving Inventory administered before and after the intervention. Results Significant group effects were observed for Received Ball (F = 4.02, p = 0.022, eta²p = 0.043), with HID showing a 9.4% improvement compared with 7.0% in AIID and 3.8% in CG from Session 1 to Session 8. Performance Score demonstrated superior gains in HID (F = 4.12, p = 0.021, eta²p = 0.045), increasing by 6.2% versus 4.1% in AIID. The Efficiency Index exhibited the largest improvement in HID (+ 70.5%), compared with + 18.7% in AIID. Problem-Solving Confidence differed significantly between groups (F = 14.82, p < 0.001, eta²p = 0.162), with HID consistently outperforming both AIID and CG across all cognitive subscales. Conclusion Human-led reflective dialogue represents a more effective, innovative training approach than AI-generated tactical prescriptions for enhancing tactical performance and problem-solving in soccer. These findings highlight the critical role of social interaction, collective reasoning, and reflective learning processes in supporting adaptive decision-making and performance development in applied soccer training contexts.
© Copyright 2026 BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation. BioMed Central. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Schlagworte:
Notationen:Spielsportarten Sozial- und Geisteswissenschaften
Tagging:künstliche Intelligenz
Veröffentlicht in:BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2026
Jahrgang:18
Seiten:246
Dokumentenarten:Artikel
Level:hoch