<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/sponet/themes/root/assets/xsl/rss.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
  <channel>
    <title>Ergebnis für Versionen - 3032566</title>
    <description>Treffer 1 - 2 von 2</description>
    <generator>Laminas_Feed_Writer 2 (https://getlaminas.org)</generator>
    <link>https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;id=3032566&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de</link>
    <opensearch:totalResults>2</opensearch:totalResults>
    <opensearch:startIndex>0</opensearch:startIndex>
    <opensearch:itemsPerPage>50</opensearch:itemsPerPage>
    <opensearch:Query role="request" searchTerms="3032566" startIndex="0"/>
    <atom:link rel="first" type="application/rss+xml" title="Zur ersten Seite springen" href="https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;view=rss&amp;id=3032566&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de"/>
    <atom:link rel="last" type="application/rss+xml" title="Zur letzten Seite springen" href="https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;view=rss&amp;id=3032566&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de&amp;page=1"/>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;view=rss&amp;id=3032566&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de"/>
    <item>
      <title>Die Auswirkung von Eintauchen  in heißes oder kaltes Wasser auf das isometrische Krafttraining</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2000 18:20:07 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/3032566</link>
      <guid>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/3032566</guid>
      <author>Burke, D. G.</author>
      <author>MacNeil, S. A.</author>
      <author>Holt, L. E.</author>
      <author>MacKinnon, N.</author>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:subject>Kraft</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Trainingsmethode</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Temperatur</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Mittel</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Thermoregulation</dc:subject>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:creator>Burke, D. G.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>MacNeil, S. A.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Holt, L. E.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>MacKinnon, N.</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Ziel der Studie war der Vergleich der  durch isometrisches Krafttraining erzielten Veränderungen in   der Kraft unter drei verschiedenen Behandlungsbedingungen:  Eintauchen in kaltes Wasser, Eintauchen in  heißes Wasser, Kontrollbedingungen. 
Es wurde nur mit dem rechten  Bein trainiert, das an 5  aufeinanderfolgenden Tagen statische Muskelkontraktionen  ausführte (1 Set/4Wiederholungen). 
Nach der Erwärmung wurden die Probanden für 10 Minuten den jeweiligen Testbedingungen ausgesetzt. Kontrollmessungen der  maximalen isometrischen  Kraft (MIFP) der Hüftstrecker (HE) am Ende der Hüftbeugung erfolgten davor und nach Absolvieren derÜbungen. 
Ergebnis:
Alle drei  Gruppen erreichten signifikante Verbesserungen  der isometrischen HE-Kraft im Vergleich Post- zu Pretest. Der Anstieg  der MIFP fiel in  der Kaltwassergruppe signifikant höher aus  als in den beiden anderen Gruppen. Unterschiede im Vergleich der Geschlechter traten nur in der Kaltwassergruppe auf, wobei die Männer die höheren Zuwächse erreichten.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Die Auswirkung von heißem oder kaltem Wasser auf das isometrische Krafttraining</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2000 18:20:07 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/4004358</link>
      <guid>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/4004358</guid>
      <author>Burke, D. G.</author>
      <author>MacNeil, S. A.</author>
      <author>Holt, L. E.</author>
      <author>MacKinnon, N. C.</author>
      <author>Rasmussen, R. L.</author>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Temperatur</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Physiotherapie</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Kraft</dc:subject>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:creator>Burke, D. G.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>MacNeil, S. A.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Holt, L. E.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>MacKinnon, N. C.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Rasmussen, R. L.</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[The purpose of this study was to compare the changes in force production resulting from isometric strength training, in combination with 3 different treatment conditions: control, cold water immersion, and hot water immersion. Forty-five noninjured subjects between the ages of 18 and 25 were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: control, cold, or hot. Subjects exercised only their right lower limb using static muscular contractions, consisting of 1 set of 4 repetitions, for 5 consecutive days. On the first day, after a few warm-up contractions, subjects were measured for maximum isometric force production (MIFP) of the hip extensor (HE) musculature at the end range of hip flexion. After this initial measure, subjects underwent their respective treatments. Control subjects rested for 10 minutes, subjects in the cold group stood in a cold water bath (8 ± 1° C) immersed up to their gluteal fold for 10 minutes, and subjects in the hot group stood in a hot water bath (43 ± 1° C) immersed up to their gluteal fold for 10 minutes. After the last training session, subjects were again measured for MIFP of the HE musculature at end range. Group results were assessed using a two-way analysis of variance procedure, comparing changes in isometric force production from pre- to posttest and between sexes. Multiple comparisons were performed to determine where significant (p < 0.05) differences occurred. All 3 groups had significant improvements in HE isometric force production (pre to post). The increase in MIFP for the cold group was significantly greater than that of the control
and hot groups. Sex differences were evident in the cold group only, with men experiencing greater increases.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
