<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/sponet/themes/root/assets/xsl/rss.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
  <channel>
    <title>Ergebnis für Versionen - 3034558</title>
    <description>Treffer 1 - 2 von 2</description>
    <generator>Laminas_Feed_Writer 2 (https://getlaminas.org)</generator>
    <link>https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;id=3034558&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de</link>
    <opensearch:totalResults>2</opensearch:totalResults>
    <opensearch:startIndex>0</opensearch:startIndex>
    <opensearch:itemsPerPage>50</opensearch:itemsPerPage>
    <opensearch:Query role="request" searchTerms="3034558" startIndex="0"/>
    <atom:link rel="first" type="application/rss+xml" title="Zur ersten Seite springen" href="https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;view=rss&amp;id=3034558&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de"/>
    <atom:link rel="last" type="application/rss+xml" title="Zur letzten Seite springen" href="https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;view=rss&amp;id=3034558&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de&amp;page=1"/>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;view=rss&amp;id=3034558&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de"/>
    <item>
      <title>Der Einfluss verschieden langer Erholungsintervalle auf die Niedersprungleistung</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2001 22:32:43 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/3034558</link>
      <guid>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/3034558</guid>
      <author>Read, M. M.</author>
      <author>Cisar, C.</author>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:subject>Trainingsmethode</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Schnellkraft</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Belastungsgestaltung</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>plyometrisches Training</dc:subject>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:creator>Read, M. M.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Cisar, C.</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Ziel der Untersuchung war die Ermittlung der Auswirkungen  verschieden langer Erholungsintervalle  auf die vertikalsprunghöhe  und die Bodenreaktionskräfte  bei Niedersprüngen aus einer definierten optimalen Höhe. Die optimale Sprunghöhe wurde für alle 12 Probanden im Vorhinaein im bereich 10-80 cm ermittelt. Es wurden 3 Sets zu je 10 Niedersprüngen absolviert, die Pausenintervalle betrugen 15, 30 und 60 sek. Für jeden Versuch wurden  die maximale vertikale Sprunghöhe  und die vertikalen Bodenreaktionskräfte ermittelt. 
Die Zweiweg-Varianzanalyse ergab,  dass die Dauer der Erholungsintervalle weder Vertikalsprunghöhe noch Bodenreaktionskraft beeinflusst. Daher  reicht ein 15-sek-Pausenintervall  zur Wiederherstellung zwischen Den Niedersprüngen aus.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Der Einfluss unterschiedlicher Erholungsintervalldauer auf die Niedersprungleistung</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2001 22:32:43 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/4006222</link>
      <guid>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/4006222</guid>
      <author>Read, M. M.</author>
      <author>Cisar, C.</author>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:subject>Belastungsintensität</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>plyometrisches Training</dc:subject>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:creator>Read, M. M.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Cisar, C.</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[The purpose of this study was to measure the effects of varied rest interval lengths on the vertical jump heights and ground reaction forces during the execution of a depth jump from a predetermined optimal height. The subjects were 12 men with a mean (SD) age of 25.08 ± 2.43 years. Each subject's optimal depth jump height was determined by executing depth jumps from 10-80 cm. After determining their optimal depth jump height, the subjects performed 3 sets of 10 depth jumps, each set with a different rest interval duration. The 3 rest intervals between depth jumps were 15, 30, and 60 seconds and were counterbalanced for each subject. Maximal vertical jump height and vertical ground reaction forces were calculated for each depth jump trial. The Peak Performance Motion  easurement System was used to measure vertical jump height and the Kistler force platform was used to measure ground reaction forces. Two-way analyses of variance revealed that rest interval length did not affect (p > 0.05) vertical jump height or vertical ground reaction forces. Therefore, this study demonstrated a 15-second rest interval was sufficient for recovery during the performance of depth jumps.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
