<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/sponet/themes/root/assets/xsl/rss.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
  <channel>
    <title>Ergebnis für Versionen - 3036934</title>
    <description>Treffer 1 - 2 von 2</description>
    <generator>Laminas_Feed_Writer 2 (https://getlaminas.org)</generator>
    <link>https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;id=3036934&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de</link>
    <opensearch:totalResults>2</opensearch:totalResults>
    <opensearch:startIndex>0</opensearch:startIndex>
    <opensearch:itemsPerPage>50</opensearch:itemsPerPage>
    <opensearch:Query role="request" searchTerms="3036934" startIndex="0"/>
    <atom:link rel="first" type="application/rss+xml" title="Zur ersten Seite springen" href="https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;view=rss&amp;id=3036934&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de"/>
    <atom:link rel="last" type="application/rss+xml" title="Zur letzten Seite springen" href="https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;view=rss&amp;id=3036934&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de&amp;page=1"/>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;view=rss&amp;id=3036934&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de"/>
    <item>
      <title>Effektivität von Radcross-Training zwischen den Wettkampfsaisons bei Langstreckenläuferinnen</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2003 01:56:57 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/4008330</link>
      <guid>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/4008330</guid>
      <author>White, L. J.</author>
      <author>Dressendorfer, R. H.</author>
      <author>Muller, S. M.</author>
      <author>Ferguson, M. A.</author>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:subject>Langstreckenlauf</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Lauf</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>O2-Aufnahme</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Radsport</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Trainingsmethode</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Trainingsmittel</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Trainingsperiodisierung</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>weiblich</dc:subject>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:creator>White, L. J.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Dressendorfer, R. H.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Muller, S. M.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Ferguson, M. A.</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[The purpose of this study was to examine whether substituting 50% of run training volume with cycling ("cross-training") would maintain 3,000-m race time and estimated O2max in competitive female distance runners during a 5-week recuperative phase. Eleven collegiate runners were randomly assigned to either the run training-only (R) group (n = 6) or the cycle training (R/C) group (n = 5), which cross-trained on alternate days. The groups trained daily at a reduced intensity (75-80% of maximum heart rate). Training volume was similar to the competitive season (40-50 mi·wk1) except that cycling represented 50% of volume for the R/C group. On follow-up, 3,000-m time was 1.4% (9 seconds) slower in the R group and 3.4% (22 seconds) slower in the R/C group. No important change in estimated O2max was found for either group. It was concluded that cycle cross-training adequately maintained aerobic performance during the recuperative phase between the cross-country and track seasons, comparable to the primary sport of running.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Effektivität von Radcross-Training zwischen den Wettkampfsaisons bei Langstreckenläuferinnen</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2003 01:56:57 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/3036934</link>
      <guid>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/3036934</guid>
      <author>White, L. J.</author>
      <author>Dressendorfer, R. H.</author>
      <author>Muller, S. M.</author>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:subject>Langstreckenlauf</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>weiblich</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Trainingsmethode</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>O2-Aufnahme</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Trainingsperiodisierung</dc:subject>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:creator>White, L. J.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Dressendorfer, R. H.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Muller, S. M.</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[The purpose of this study was to examine whether substituting 50% of run training volume with cycling ("cross-training") would maintain 3,000-m race time and estimated O2max in competitive female distance runners during a 5-week recuperative phase. Eleven collegiate runners were randomly assigned to either the run training-only (R) group (n = 6) or the cycle training (R/C) group (n = 5), which cross-trained on alternate days. The groups trained daily at a reduced intensity (75-80% of maximum heart rate). Training volume was similar to the competitive season (40-50 mi·wk1) except that cycling represented 50% of volume for the R/C group. On follow-up, 3,000-m time was 1.4% (9 seconds) slower in the R group and 3.4% (22 seconds) slower in the R/C group. No important change in estimated O2max was found for either group. It was concluded that cycle cross-training adequately maintained aerobic performance during the recuperative phase between the cross-country and track seasons, comparable to the primary sport of running.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
