<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/sponet/themes/root/assets/xsl/rss.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
  <channel>
    <title>Ergebnis für Versionen - 4008312</title>
    <description>Treffer 1 - 2 von 2</description>
    <generator>Laminas_Feed_Writer 2 (https://getlaminas.org)</generator>
    <link>https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;id=4008312&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de</link>
    <opensearch:totalResults>2</opensearch:totalResults>
    <opensearch:startIndex>0</opensearch:startIndex>
    <opensearch:itemsPerPage>50</opensearch:itemsPerPage>
    <opensearch:Query role="request" searchTerms="4008312" startIndex="0"/>
    <atom:link rel="first" type="application/rss+xml" title="Zur ersten Seite springen" href="https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;view=rss&amp;id=4008312&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de"/>
    <atom:link rel="last" type="application/rss+xml" title="Zur letzten Seite springen" href="https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;view=rss&amp;id=4008312&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de&amp;page=1"/>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;view=rss&amp;id=4008312&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de"/>
    <item>
      <title>Gleichzeitiges Kraft- und Ausdauertraining: der Einfluss der Auswahl abhängiger Variablen</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2003 01:21:46 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/4008312</link>
      <guid>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/4008312</guid>
      <author>Leveritt, M.</author>
      <author>Abernethy, P. J.</author>
      <author>Barry, B.</author>
      <author>Logan, P. A.</author>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:subject>Ausdauer</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Kraft</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>O2-Aufnahme</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Trainingsmethode</dc:subject>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:creator>Leveritt, M.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Abernethy, P. J.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Barry, B.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Logan, P. A.</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Twenty-six active university students were randomly allocated to resistance (R, n = 9), endurance (E, n = 8), and concurrent resistance and endurance (C, n = 9) training conditions. Training was completed 3 times per week in all conditions, with endurance training preceding resistance training in the C group. Resistance training involved 4 sets of upper- and lower-body exercises with loads of 4-8 repetition maximum (RM). Each endurance training session consisted of five 5-minute bouts of incremental cycle exercise at between 40 and 100% of peak oxygen uptake (O2peak). Parameters measured prior to and following training included strength (1RM and isometric and isokinetic [1.04, 3.12, 5.20, and 8.67 rad·s1] strength), O2peak and Wingate test performance (peak power output [PPO], average power, and relative power decline). Significant improvements in 1RM strength were observed in the R and C groups following training. O2peak significantly increased in E and C but was significantly reduced in R after training. Effect size (ES) transformations on the other dependent variables suggested that performance changes in the C group were not always similar to changes in the R or E groups. These ES data suggest that statistical power and dependent variable selection are significant issues in enhancing our insights into concurrent training. It may be necessary to assess a range of performance parameters to monitor the relative effectiveness of a particular concurrent training regimen.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Gleichzeitiges Kraft- und Ausdauertraining: Der Einfluss der Auswahl abhängiger Variablen</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2003 01:21:46 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/3036899</link>
      <guid>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/3036899</guid>
      <author>Leveritt, M.</author>
      <author>Logan, P. A.</author>
      <author>Abernethy, P. J.</author>
      <author>Barry, B.</author>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Ausdauer</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Kraft</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Trainingsmethode</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>O2-Aufnahme</dc:subject>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:creator>Leveritt, M.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Logan, P. A.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Abernethy, P. J.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Barry, B.</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Twenty-six active university students were randomly allocated to resistance (R, n = 9), endurance (E, n = 8), and concurrent resistance and endurance (C, n = 9) training conditions. Training was completed 3 times per week in all conditions, with endurance training preceding resistance training in the C group. Resistance training involved 4 sets of upper- and lower-body exercises with loads of 4-8 repetition maximum (RM). Each endurance training session consisted of five 5-minute bouts of incremental cycle exercise at between 40 and 100% of peak oxygen uptake (O2peak). Parameters measured prior to and following training included strength (1RM and isometric and isokinetic [1.04, 3.12, 5.20, and 8.67 rad·s1] strength), O2peak and Wingate test performance (peak power output [PPO], average power, and relative power decline). Significant improvements in 1RM strength were observed in the R and C groups following training. O2peak significantly increased in E and C but was significantly reduced in R after training. Effect size (ES) transformations on the other dependent variables suggested that performance changes in the C group were not always similar to changes in the R or E groups. These ES data suggest that statistical power and dependent variable selection are significant issues in enhancing our insights into concurrent training. It may be necessary to assess a range of performance parameters to monitor the relative effectiveness of a particular concurrent training regimen.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
