<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/sponet/themes/root/assets/xsl/rss.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
  <channel>
    <title>Ergebnis für Versionen - 4043595</title>
    <description>Treffer 1 - 2 von 2</description>
    <generator>Laminas_Feed_Writer 2 (https://getlaminas.org)</generator>
    <link>https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;id=4043595&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de</link>
    <opensearch:totalResults>2</opensearch:totalResults>
    <opensearch:startIndex>0</opensearch:startIndex>
    <opensearch:itemsPerPage>50</opensearch:itemsPerPage>
    <opensearch:Query role="request" searchTerms="4043595" startIndex="0"/>
    <atom:link rel="first" type="application/rss+xml" title="Zur ersten Seite springen" href="https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;view=rss&amp;id=4043595&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de"/>
    <atom:link rel="last" type="application/rss+xml" title="Zur letzten Seite springen" href="https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;view=rss&amp;id=4043595&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de&amp;page=1"/>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;view=rss&amp;id=4043595&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de"/>
    <item>
      <title>Nutzung einer Ballmaschine im Tennis: Bewegungsauftakt und Timing des Schwungs beim Return von Bällen aus einer Ballmaschine und von einem realen Spieler</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2014 23:59:26 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/4043595</link>
      <guid>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/4043595</guid>
      <author>Carboch, J.</author>
      <author>Süss, V.</author>
      <author>Kocib, T.</author>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:subject>Tennis</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Bewegungskoordination</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Hilfsgerät</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Biomechanik</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Analyse</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Geschwindigkeit</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Sportgerät</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Bewegung</dc:subject>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:creator>Carboch, J.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Süss, V.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Kocib, T.</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Practicing with the use of a ball machine could handicap a player compared to playing against an actual opponent. Recent studies have shown some differences in swing timing and movement coordination, when a player faces a ball projection machine as opposed to a human opponent. We focused on the time of movement initiation and on stroke timing during returning tennis serves (simulated by a ball machine or by a real server). Receivers` movements were measured on a tennis court. In spite of using a serving ball speed from 90 kph to 135 kph, results showed significant differences in movement initiation and backswing duration between serves received from a ball machine and serves received from a real server. Players had shorter movement initiation when they faced a ball machine. Backswing duration was longer for the group using a ball machine. That demonstrates different movement timing of tennis returns when players face a ball machine. Use of ball machines in tennis practice should be limited as it may disrupt stroke timing.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Einsatz der Ballmaschine im Tennis: Initiierung von Bewegungen und Timing der Schwungbewegung beim Return nach Aufgaben durch die Ballmaschine und durch reale Tennisspieler</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2014 23:59:26 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/4031626</link>
      <guid>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/4031626</guid>
      <author>Carboch, J.</author>
      <author>Süss, V.</author>
      <author>Kocib, T.</author>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:subject>Tennis</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Abwehr</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Technik</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Hilfsgerät</dc:subject>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:creator>Carboch, J.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Süss, V.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Kocib, T.</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Practicing with the use of a ball machine could handicap a player compared to playing against an actual opponent. Recent studies have shown some differences in swing timing and movement coordination, when a player faces a ball projection machine as opposed to a human opponent. We focused on the time of movement initiation and on stroke timing during returning tennis serves (simulated by a ball machine or by a real server). Receivers` movements were measured on a tennis court. In spite of using a serving ball speed from 90 kph to 135 kph, results showed significant differences in movement initiation and backswing duration between serves received from a ball machine and serves received from a real server. Players had shorter movement initiation when they faced a ball machine. Backswing duration was longer for the group using a ball machine. That demonstrates different movement timing of tennis returns when players face a ball machine. Use of ball machines in tennis practice should be limited as it may disrupt stroke timing.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
