<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/sponet/themes/root/assets/xsl/rss.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
  <channel>
    <title>Ergebnis für Versionen - 4062565</title>
    <description>Treffer 1 - 2 von 2</description>
    <generator>Laminas_Feed_Writer 2 (https://getlaminas.org)</generator>
    <link>https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;id=4062565&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de</link>
    <opensearch:totalResults>2</opensearch:totalResults>
    <opensearch:startIndex>0</opensearch:startIndex>
    <opensearch:itemsPerPage>50</opensearch:itemsPerPage>
    <opensearch:Query role="request" searchTerms="4062565" startIndex="0"/>
    <atom:link rel="first" type="application/rss+xml" title="Zur ersten Seite springen" href="https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;view=rss&amp;id=4062565&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de"/>
    <atom:link rel="last" type="application/rss+xml" title="Zur letzten Seite springen" href="https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;view=rss&amp;id=4062565&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de&amp;page=1"/>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;view=rss&amp;id=4062565&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de"/>
    <item>
      <title>Die Auswirkungen des britischen Rechts auf den Sport</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 23:20:29 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/4065309</link>
      <guid>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/4065309</guid>
      <author>Crainey, S.</author>
      <author>Codona, R.</author>
      <author>Elder, B.</author>
      <dc:format>elektronische Publikation</dc:format>
      <dc:format>Blog</dc:format>
      <dc:subject>Recht</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Gesetz</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>staatlich</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Sportler</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Sportverband</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Sportverein</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Beruf</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Virus</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Infektion</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Großbritannien</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Sportmedizin</dc:subject>
      <dc:tag>Coronavirus</dc:tag>
      <dc:format>elektronische Publikation</dc:format>
      <dc:format>Blog</dc:format>
      <dc:creator>Crainey, S.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Codona, R.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Elder, B.</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Sport is often viewed as a special entity whereby the law and legal systems do not directly interfere with its rules (Laver, 2020). Therefore, the rules under which a particular sport is played are not an area where the legal system will usually interfere.

The government in the United Kingdom has adopted this non-interventionist approach to sport, meaning there is no general law for sport. Instead regulation is left to the National Governing Bodies (NBGs) (Bennett, 2019).

However, with the turn of a new decade and the economic crash caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, some major issues in sports law have arisen, including whether an athlete is an employee or worker, the terms and conditions governing athletes and their use of social media platforms. Can these issues possibly be addressed, never mind resolved?]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Der Einfluss des britischen Rechts auf den Sport</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 23:20:29 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/4062565</link>
      <guid>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/4062565</guid>
      <author>Crainey, S.</author>
      <author>Codona, R.</author>
      <author>Elder, N.</author>
      <dc:format>Blog</dc:format>
      <dc:subject>Beruf</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Sportsoziologie</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Recht</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Gesetz</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Großbritannien</dc:subject>
      <dc:tag>Social Media</dc:tag>
      <dc:tag>Coronavirus</dc:tag>
      <dc:format>Blog</dc:format>
      <dc:creator>Crainey, S.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Codona, R.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Elder, N.</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Sport is often viewed as a special entity whereby the law and legal systems do not directly interfere with its rules (Laver, 2020). Therefore, the rules under which a particular sport is played are not an area where the legal system will usually interfere.

The government in the United Kingdom has adopted this non-interventionist approach to sport, meaning there is no general law for sport. Instead regulation is left to the National Governing Bodies (NBGs) (Bennett, 2019).

However, with the turn of a new decade and the economic crash caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, some major issues in sports law have arisen, including whether an athlete is an employee or worker, the terms and conditions governing athletes and their use of social media platforms. Can these issues possibly be addressed, never mind resolved?

Main questions and problems are, e. g.:
Is an Athlete an employee or a worker?
Employment rights: employees vs workers
Athletes in the world of social media
A delicate balancing act
Maternal/paternal rights for athletes
Maternity rights
Paternity rights
How has Coronavirus has affected sport?]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
