<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/sponet/themes/root/assets/xsl/rss.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
  <channel>
    <title>Results for Versions - 4067487</title>
    <description>Showing 1 - 2 results of 2</description>
    <generator>Laminas_Feed_Writer 2 (https://getlaminas.org)</generator>
    <link>https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;id=4067487&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=en</link>
    <opensearch:totalResults>2</opensearch:totalResults>
    <opensearch:startIndex>0</opensearch:startIndex>
    <opensearch:itemsPerPage>50</opensearch:itemsPerPage>
    <opensearch:Query role="request" searchTerms="4067487" startIndex="0"/>
    <atom:link rel="first" type="application/rss+xml" title="Go to First Page" href="https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;view=rss&amp;id=4067487&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=en"/>
    <atom:link rel="last" type="application/rss+xml" title="Go to Last Page" href="https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;view=rss&amp;id=4067487&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=en&amp;page=1"/>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;view=rss&amp;id=4067487&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=en"/>
    <item>
      <title>Validität und Reliabilität eines Reißtests zur Modellierung des Kraft-Geschwindigkeits-Verhältnisses bei männlichen Elite-Gewichthebern</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 03:39:12 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/4078102</link>
      <guid>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/4078102</guid>
      <author>Sandau, I.</author>
      <author>Chaabene, H.</author>
      <author>Granacher, U.</author>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:subject>Gewichtheben</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Leistungssport</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Leistung</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Test</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Gütekriterien</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Kraft</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Übung</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>maximal</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Geschwindigkeit</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Biomechanik</dc:subject>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:creator>Sandau, I.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Chaabene, H.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Granacher, U.</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[This study examined the concurrent validity and within-session reliability of parameters describing the force-velocity relationship (FvR) such as maximal force, velocity, power, and the theoretical one repetition maximum snatch performance (snatchth) during the snatch pull. The FvR was assessed using the multiple-load (FvRm) approach and the 2-load (FvR2) approach. Eight male elite weightlifters from the German national team executed the snatch pull in 2 separate experiments. For the concurrent validity assessment (experiment one), during the snatch pull, 7 loads from 70 to 100% were lifted to compute the FvRm, and 2 loads (70 and 100%) were lifted to compute the FvR2. For the reliability assessment (experiment 2), a test-retest protocol for the FvR2 was conducted. Input FvR parameters were determined from video-based barbell tracking. Results indicated no differences (all p > 0.05; all d = 0.07) and extremely large correlations (all r = 0.91) between the FvRm and FvR2 parameters. The within-session reliability of FvR2 parameters was excellent (all intraclass correlation coefficient =0.97; SEM% =1.23%). The percentage smallest real difference (SRD95%) of FvR2 parameters ranged between 1.89 and 3.39%. In summary, using the snatch pull to model FvR2 parameters is a valid and reliable approach that can easily be integrated into elite weightlifters' daily training routines.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Validität und Reliabilität eines Zugtests zur Modellierung der Kraft-Geschwindigkeits-Beziehung bei männlichen Spitzen-Gewichthebern</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 03:39:12 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/4067487</link>
      <guid>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/4067487</guid>
      <author>Sandau, I.</author>
      <author>Chaabene, H.</author>
      <author>Granacher, U.</author>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:subject>Gewichtheben</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Test</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Kraft</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Training</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Video</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Geschwindigkeit</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Gütekriterien</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Motion Capturing</dc:subject>
      <dc:tag>Reliabilität</dc:tag>
      <dc:tag>Validität</dc:tag>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:creator>Sandau, I.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Chaabene, H.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Granacher, U.</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[This study examined the concurrent validity and within-session reliability of parameters describing the force-velocity relationship (FvR) such as maximal force, velocity, power, and the theoretical one repetition maximum snatch performance (snatchth) during the snatch pull. The FvR was assessed using the multiple-load (FvRm) approach and the 2-load (FvR2) approach. Eight male elite weightlifters from the German national team executed the snatch pull in 2 separate experiments. For the concurrent validity assessment (experiment one), during the snatch pull, 7 loads from 70 to 100% were lifted to compute the FvRm, and 2 loads (70 and 100%) were lifted to compute the FvR2. For the reliability assessment (experiment 2), a test-retest protocol for the FvR2 was conducted. Input FvR parameters were determined from video-based barbell tracking. Results indicated no differences (all p > 0.05; all d = 0.07) and extremely large correlations (all r = 0.91) between the FvRm and FvR2 parameters. The within-session reliability of FvR2 parameters was excellent (all intraclass correlation coefficient =0.97; SEM% =1.23%). The percentage smallest real difference (SRD95%) of FvR2 parameters ranged between 1.89 and 3.39%. In summary, using the snatch pull to model FvR2 parameters is a valid and reliable approach that can easily be integrated into elite weightlifters' daily training routines. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348622408_Validity_and_Reliability_of_a_Snatch_Pull_Test_to_Model_the_Force-Velocity_Relationship_in_Male_Elite_Weightlifters]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
