<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/sponet/themes/root/assets/xsl/rss.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:opensearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/">
  <channel>
    <title>Ergebnis für Versionen - 4090508</title>
    <description>Treffer 1 - 2 von 2</description>
    <generator>Laminas_Feed_Writer 2 (https://getlaminas.org)</generator>
    <link>https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;id=4090508&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de</link>
    <opensearch:totalResults>2</opensearch:totalResults>
    <opensearch:startIndex>0</opensearch:startIndex>
    <opensearch:itemsPerPage>50</opensearch:itemsPerPage>
    <opensearch:Query role="request" searchTerms="4090508" startIndex="0"/>
    <atom:link rel="first" type="application/rss+xml" title="Zur ersten Seite springen" href="https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;view=rss&amp;id=4090508&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de"/>
    <atom:link rel="last" type="application/rss+xml" title="Zur letzten Seite springen" href="https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;view=rss&amp;id=4090508&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de&amp;page=1"/>
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="https://sponet.de/sponet/Search/Versions?sort=first_indexed+desc%2Cfirst_indexed+desc&amp;limit=50&amp;view=rss&amp;id=4090508&amp;search=versions&amp;lng=de"/>
    <item>
      <title>Akute Auswirkungen von Foam Rolling vs. Vibration Foam Rolling auf die Blutflussparameter bei Profifußballern: Ein randomisiertes Crossover-Design</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 01:45:50 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/4090508</link>
      <guid>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/4090508</guid>
      <author>Padrón-Cabo, A.</author>
      <author>Alonso-Calvete, A.</author>
      <author>Radziminski, L.</author>
      <author>Rey, E.</author>
      <author>Lorenzo-Martínez, M.</author>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:subject>Sportmedizin</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Fußball</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Wiederherstellung</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Massage</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Blut</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Parameter</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Geschwindigkeit</dc:subject>
      <dc:tag>Faszienrolle</dc:tag>
      <dc:tag>Vibration</dc:tag>
      <dc:tag>Vergleich</dc:tag>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:creator>Padrón-Cabo, A.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Alonso-Calvete, A.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Radziminski, L.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Rey, E.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Lorenzo-Martínez, M.</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[The study aimed to compare the effects of foam roller (FR) and vibration foam roller (VFR) on blood flow parameters, measured by Doppler ultrasonography in professional soccer players. A randomized crossover design was used, and 10 professional soccer players participated in 3 experimental sessions: FR, VFR, and a control condition (CC). The maximum velocity (MVel) and maximum volume (MVol) blood flow parameters were measured in the common femoral artery of the dominant leg at 5 different time points as follows: before (pre), immediately after (post 0'), 10 (post 10'), 20 (post 20'), and 30 minutes (post 30') after the intervention. Both FR and VFR involved two 45-second sets with 15-second rest between sets in the quadriceps and hamstring, while CC required sitting for 240 seconds. The FR condition showed a significant increase in MVel (p < 0.01) at all time points after the intervention, and an increase in MVol (p < 0.05) only at post 0' compared with pre. The VFR condition showed a significant (p < 0.05) increase in MVel at post 0' and post 10' and an increase (p < 0.05) in MVol at post 0' compared with pre. In comparison with CC, the FR and VFR conditions presented significantly (p < 0.05) higher MVel values at post 0', post 10', post 20', and post 30' than CC. For both FR and VFR conditions, the MVol not only revealed a significant (p < 0.05) increase at post 0' but also at post 10' for VFR compared with CC. In summary, the FR and VFR interventions demonstrated a similar increase in blood flow parameters, suggesting that both strategies may accelerate physiological recovery in elite soccer players.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Akute Auswirkungen von Foam Rolling vs. Vibration Foam Rolling auf die Blutflussparameter bei Profifußballern: ein randomisiertes Crossover-Design</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2024 01:45:50 +0100</pubDate>
      <link>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/4089832</link>
      <guid>https://sponet.de/sponet/Record/4089832</guid>
      <author>Padrón-Cabo, A.</author>
      <author>Alonso-Calvete, A.</author>
      <author>Radziminski, L.</author>
      <author>Rey, E.</author>
      <author>Lorenzo-Martínez, M.</author>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:subject>Fußball</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Profisport</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Blut</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Parameter</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Sportmedizin</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Trainingswirkung</dc:subject>
      <dc:tag>Blutfluss</dc:tag>
      <dc:format>Artikel</dc:format>
      <dc:creator>Padrón-Cabo, A.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Alonso-Calvete, A.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Radziminski, L.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Rey, E.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Lorenzo-Martínez, M.</dc:creator>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[The study aimed to compare the effects of foam roller (FR) and vibration foam roller (VFR) on blood flow parameters, measured by Doppler ultrasonography in professional soccer players. A randomized crossover design was used, and 10 professional soccer players participated in 3 experimental sessions: FR, VFR, and a control condition (CC). The maximum velocity (MVel) and maximum volume (MVol) blood flow parameters were measured in the common femoral artery of the dominant leg at 5 different time points as follows: before (pre), immediately after (post 0'), 10 (post 10'), 20 (post 20'), and 30 minutes (post 30') after the intervention. Both FR and VFR involved two 45-second sets with 15-second rest between sets in the quadriceps and hamstring, while CC required sitting for 240 seconds. The FR condition showed a significant increase in MVel (p < 0.01) at all time points after the intervention, and an increase in MVol (p < 0.05) only at post 0' compared with pre. The VFR condition showed a significant (p < 0.05) increase in MVel at post 0' and post 10' and an increase (p < 0.05) in MVol at post 0' compared with pre. In comparison with CC, the FR and VFR conditions presented significantly (p < 0.05) higher MVel values at post 0', post 10', post 20', and post 30' than CC. For both FR and VFR conditions, the MVol not only revealed a significant (p < 0.05) increase at post 0' but also at post 10' for VFR compared with CC. In summary, the FR and VFR interventions demonstrated a similar increase in blood flow parameters, suggesting that both strategies may accelerate physiological recovery in elite soccer players.]]></content:encoded>
      <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
